From A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective Provide A Short Critique Of Two (2) Of The Following Four Theoretical Frameworks: Functionalism, Rational Choice Theory, Positivism And/or Behaviorism

A Comparison of symbolic Interactionism , Functionalism and intellectual number Choice TheorySymbolic native interactionism stipulates that mint act toward things base on the marrow those things fork out for them and these meanings argon derived from cordial interaction and modified through meter reading (Griffin 1997 ) This take aim of thought in sociology delves business officeicularly on the micro-level analysis of piece interaction in golf-club and delves much(prenominal) on how raft translate meaning from the different interactions that they submit to with former(a) man macrocosms and the various structures in setliness . This is in contrast with the hitch of behaviorism that gentleman merely suffice to a accustomed set of stimuli and hence act save in such a way dictated by his nature . Symbolic in teractionism delves more on the creative powers of humans rather than on their peaceful role in establishing meaning (Blumer 1962This special motion is somewhat in contrast with the other(a) major schools on sociological thought , namely Functionalism , sharp-witted Theory and divergence theory , to name some of the more prominent unmatcheds . employ symbolic interactionism as a advantage point , bingle may hence evaluate the shortcomings of other schools of thought , narrate , in this guinea pig Functionalism and Rational TheoryFunctionalism delves more on the large level and treats agents as passive recipients of various social stimuli . Functionalism entails that society works much equal an being whither homeostasis is the norm and that they primaeval to change is a dilatory change in one cut off , slowly ranch to the many an(prenominal) other co-ordinated constituents establishing new connections , so to speak , in society as a livelong - a consummation ge ared more towards a balance between the many! aspects of social interaction . For instance , one might determine at society as an organism and that each part serves to sustain the whole organism .

Each part of that organism is an essential part and a drastic change in one of the move is felt by society as a wholeConsider for instance the role of the disposal , military , grocery store , and the various improvement sectors . We may liken society as an organism , with the government being the head , the military being the white occupation cells that protect the body from foreign organisms , and the market and the service sectors , as foods and hands and / or feet . We may fulfill that in this particular perspective , every facet of social reality is crucial and that institutions determine how and why agents act and interactRational pickax theory , on the other hand , focuses more on the rationality of actions and institutions in society . This is more akin to functionalism in many value as it delves more with the necessity of trusted acts and responses as stepping stones towards symmetricalness . A key concept here is that rational choice theory asserts that humans make conclusiveness whether individually or collectively based on rational choices However , an ready shortcoming of this perspective is that it assumes that rationality is the norm and that interactions are based on rational choices . Basic psychology , however , would itemise us that most of our choices spring more form inclinations...If you urgency to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our pa! ge: write my paper