The Science of Cloning :: essays research papers

The Science of re-createIn the essay, Cloning Reality Brave New World by Wesley J. Smith, a skew view of the effects of cl adept is presented. Wesley lives that cloning will end the comprehension of human life as sacred and ruin the great salmagundi that exists today. He feels that cloning may in fact, end human partnership as we know it, and create a horrible place where humans are simply a resource. I disagree with Wesley because I theorise that the positive effects of controlled human cloning can greatly reform the quality of life for humans today, and that these benefits far outweigh the potential drawbacks that could hap if cloning was misused.Human cloning is one of the most controversial subjects in modern times. Supporters claim that cloning is a great advance in science and can lead to great discoveries and medical breakthroughs. Opponents feel that cloning is a threat to human individuality and is potenti all toldy disastrous. Both sides view reasonable arguments, however I feel that Wesley takes things a bit besides far in his grim outlook on the future of humanity. Sure, on that point are downsides to cloning, and yes it can be dangerous if it is used for the wrong purposes. This is true(p) with almost any new technology. From gunpowder to cars to airplanes to computers to the Internet any one of these technologies can be harnessed for negative purposes. Despite the risks involved however, all of these technologies have improved our standard of living and quality of life, and I feel cloning will do the same.Wesley J. Smith goes on and on astir(predicate) how eugenicists would want to create homogeneity among Humans, valuing traits such as intelligence and looks kinda of love, compassion, and empathy. He feels that this would create an unnatural society of human beings, creating chaos among the world. What he fails to recognize however is that it is not nearly as simple to do this as he thinks. Right now, cloning is in its very main(a ) stages, and most research being done is for medical purposes. Through forward our knowledge in cloning and genetic engineering, we can eliminate unwanted traits and genetic unsoundnesss. Wesley may then try to argue that these unwanted traits and diseases aim us unique, but I doubt he will pop much support, especially from somebody who suffers from some horrible genetic disease or deformity.Wesley then uses nature itself in his arguments by stating Eugenics, as cruddy as it is, is only the beginning of the threat posed to the natural straddle by human cloning.