Louise Erdrichs Tracks Essays -- Louise Erdrich Tracks Essays

Louise Erdrichs TracksIn Louise Erdrichs Tracks, the readers discovers by the second chapter that on that point are two tellers, Nanapush and Pauline Puyat. This method of having two narrators apprisal their stories alternately could be at first confusing, especially if the readers hasnt been briefed about it or hasnt read a synopsis of it. Traditionally, there is one narrator in the story, but Erdrich does an effective and spectacular job in unite Nanapush and Paulines stories. It is so substantially written that one top executive question as he or she reads who is the principal case in this story? Being that there are two narrators, is it Nanapush, the first narrator, him macrocosm a participant in the story, who tells his story in the I form? Or is it Pauline, the second narrator, who also narrates in the I form? Upon further reading, the motive for twain narrators stories become to a greater extent evident, and by the end of the book, it becomes clear that one character is the driving force for both of the narrators stories. This central character is Fleur Pillager. She in particular is the protagonist of Tracks. Even though she is limited in dialogues, her actions speak more than than words itself. Structurally speaking, Fleur is mentioned in every chapter of the book, either being referred to by the two narrators or being part of the story. In fact, after researching the impertinent several times, no other character including the two narrators is consistently mentioned in every chapter. In the first chapter, Nanapush tells Lulu, his granddaughter, about the fate of the Chippewa Tribe. He hence spends most of the chapter discussing the beginning of Fleur, who is Lulus mother, and how he saved her life. In the second chapter, Pauline, the second narrator, begins her story gossiping about Fleur to an unknown attender in detail. Pauline continues to focus her story on Fleurs life, discussing in length of incidents about her. Paulines obsessive b ehavior becomes more evident when shes in Argus with Fleur. Since that night (in Argus), Fleur puts me in the closet, I was no longer overjealous or afraid of her, but come after her close as Russell (Paulines cousin), closer, stayed with her, became her moving shadow that the men neer noticed (22).Therefore, in these two chapters both narrators set the stage for vocalizing their stories on their account of Fleur. Not o... ...med to gain attention by telling odd tales that created damage (39). Her presence to him is more like a nettlesome fly that wont go away. It is this lack of attention by others in which drives Pauline to tell her story.Looking back at the pinch theory stated earlier, if we exclude Nanapush and his story from Tracks, what we have left is Paulines obsession with Fleur. In Paulines eyes, as well as others, Fleur is good- looking, mysteriously powerful and dangerous. In contrast to her who is a skinny, big-nosed girl with staring eyes who is also so poor-lo oking (15). Pauline notices these differences and in effect becomes jealous of Fleur because of all the attention she receives from people. She sees herself in competition with Fleur. At first, Pauline just wants to be close to Fleur, but by the end she wants to be better than her. Within her story, the aim that Pauline is the protagonist and that Fleur is her antagonist could be valid, but if you look at the novel in its entirety, meaning the structure and content, the principal character that emerges from it is Fleur Pillager. practise CitedErdrich, Louise. TracksNew York Harper & Row, 1988